Hillary Clinton and the media

Hillary’s first speech about health care reform.

On June 18, 1993, First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton addressed a panel of governors at the Woodstock Town Hall in Woodstock, Vermont, as part of the Democratic Governors Association annual issues conference. The Hillary Clinton Quarterly attended the meeting and brought along its tape recorder. The following is a verbatim transcript of Mrs. Clinton’s remarks. Due to space limitations, we have not included the First Lady’s introductory remarks to the governors and some references to specific state programs.

 While many news outlets continue to speculate about specific details of the health care proposal, Mrs. Clinton’s remarks were clearly meant to establish the broad communications themes that will be used in the months ahead to sell the benefits of the program to voters. Three themes stand out in particular: health care security, personal responsibility and state participation.

— Frank Marafiote

PS For a PDF file of Hillary’s 2008 “American Health Choices Plan” click here.

Address by Hillary Rodham Clinton
to the Democratic Governors Association

I’d like to take a few minutes to talk about the process we have undertaken to improve the country’s health care system, and to talk about the fundamental goals of our reform.

Just as Governor Dean (of Vermont) has already said, we tried to pull together from across our country people from every walk of life, every kind of experience, who knew what the problem was, and had experienced it first hand. We felt strongly that state government had to be represented in that process. Many of these governors, and many others, sent staff members to work with us, came in themselves to attend meetings, gave us the benefit of their deliberations as they drafted legislation, worked with legislators and with groups in their home states. We’ve been meeting on a regular basis, and we have found, as you might guess, that our process has been improved because of the contributions from the state and local level.

We’ve held more than 1,000 meetings with people who have a particular point of view on health care reform, because just about everyone in this country does have a stake in making sure we do it right. And it’s been interesting to me to see how willing people have been to put aside their own particular point of view to try to look at the whole, because it is unlikely we will — or anyone could — come up with a proposal that would satisfy everybody. Everybody will have to move a little bit to get to the point where the whole will be bigger than the sum of its parts. Many people have been willing to do just that in our efforts to craft this proposal.

We have also been working hard to educate ourselves and the American people about what is at stake. When people understand how the health care crisis impacts on them personally, not just in terms of whether or not they have insurance, or whether their insurance this year costs the same as it did last year, or whether they fear losing insurance because of something beyond their control like a pre-existing condition or their inability to change jobs, or even whether they stand scared on the precipice of the next health care disaster because they don’t have insurance — when they begin to see their personal situation in context with what is going on in the broader community, then we make real progress so that everyone understands how the pieces of this fit together. That is the kind of educational process that we are engaged in now, and each of you is a part of it.

It’s important, as I walk down later this afternoon this beautiful street I rode up to come to this meeting, to know that I will pass store after store after store — some of the people working in those stores will have insurance, down the block some will not. If a medical emergency happens later this afternoon, the person will be taken to the nearest hospital without regard to that. The person will then be given the care that is needed for that emergency. Because it is not fair to say that people go completely without care in our country. They get care, but often only in an emergency, only when it’s become more expensive than it should have. And regardless of whether that person had the insurance to take care of that emergency, it will be paid for by those of us who do — those of us who carry private insurance, those of us who have employers who pay for it, those of us who have government assistance. That is one of the reasons why when one looks at a hospital bill you’re sometimes struck by the fact that that aspirin was charged to you for $20. It’s not because it’s worth $20; it’s to take care of those people who were taken care of who didn’t have compensation.

When people begin to understand how we are all in this together, how today is not at all secure with respect to what we will have tomorrow, then the education process really takes hold. Because the most important thing that I have found as I’ve travelled around the country, no matter who I’ve talked with, is security. That’s what people want whether they think they have it now, or whether they never have — they want the security to know that their primary and preventive health care needs will be taken care of, and that their acute and chronic needs will be taken care of.

This is the key to what kind of health care reform we have to offer to the American people. Because what we have to be able to say at the end of this process is that if we enact the President’s proposal, those millions of Americans, nearly 40 million now, who do not have any insurance, will have health security, and that those millions more who have some insurance, but not enough if a real emergency comes, will have security. And, most importantly, the majority of us who do have some insurance who feel that we have taken care of ourselves through our own efforts and that of our employers — we can rest assured that we will have it next year, and the year after, and the year after that, no matter who we work for, no matter how sick we might become, no matter who we marry or the state of the health of the child that we bear, we will all be secure. We have to make it possible for every American who works for a living, who pays the bills, who takes care of raising their family, who pays the taxes, that they do not have to fear going without insurance and health security.

Once the new health care system is up and running, every American citizen and those who are permanent residents in this country will get a health security card. That card will guarantee all Americans a comprehensive package of benefits, no matter where they work, where they live, how old they are, or whether they have ever been sick. The benefits package will emphasize primary and preventive health care. We have to begin to redress the imbalance that has been allowed to develop in our health care system where we have the most highly sophisticated health care available anywhere in the world, so that you could with great ease and comfort of mind know that you can get a heart bypass, but you could not be sure that you will be able to get your child adequately immunized. We need to reverse that, to not do anything that endangers the quality of the very top of our health care system, but to build up the base so that we can provide more services and save more money because we will allocate our resources better.

Second, we are going to make sure that with that health card that guarantees those benefits packages, we will be bringing costs under control. You see, everyday what happens is that health care is priced out of reach of many Americans. Many of you have seen your own personal costs, your businesses’ costs, your states’ costs, get driven out of sight. I know that Florida’s health care costs, for example, have quadrupled in the last 12 years. And that is happening all over the country. This forces us as individuals, as businesses, as states, and as the federal government to absorb more and more red ink. It forces many segments of the health care system to shift costs wherever they can find those dollars. That’s what leads to the $20 aspirin. All of us bear the burden. If left unchecked, health care costs will continue to hurt our families, bankrupt our businesses, and our state budgets, and drive the federal deficit ever and ever higher.

We will have to rein-in health care costs in several ways. We will have to get rid of incentives for doctors to do more tests and procedures. Instead, we will create a system that encourages cost-effective, high quality care, where doctors and patients can again be at the center of the relationship, and where decisions can be made not on how something will be reimbursed, but on whether a doctor believes it is best for a patient. We will have to reduce the bureaucracy and micro-management that absorbs billions of dollars out of our health care system, and that so many of you complained about because it adds unnecessary costs. We will have to tell health care institutions and providers that we all must learn to live within a budget.

We can no longer write a blank check for health care in this country. We will have to ask everyone — workers, employers, doctors, nurses, other health care providers, hospitals — to do their part. We’ll have to tell very other aspect of the health care industry that it can no longer expect to be raising its prices and profits growing at two to three to four to five to eight times the rate of inflation. We’re going to tell workers that if they do not do their part to be responsible users of health care, then we will never be able to adequately to rein-in costs. We will also have to tell companies that do not cover their workers today and therefore drive up the costs for all those other companies that do, that it is time, finally, for everybody in America to take responsibility. That has to be one of the keys of our system. There can’t be anymore free lunch. There can’t be anymore free health care to which people feel they are entitled. There cannot be anymore people who take advantage of the system and basically take a free ride.

We’re going to tell individuals who think they can get by without coverage because they’re 25 and believe they’re immortal, that when they have that terrible accident or unpredicted illness and end up in the emergency room or in the ICU and stick us with the bill, that we’re not going to let that go on any longer. Everybody will have to contribute to the health care system, just like in many states they have to have auto insurance. Nobody can predict when you are going to have that accident or you’re going to have that illness, and it’s time that everybody bears their fair share of the responsibility for taking care of those accidents and illnesses when they occur.

It is an absolutely critical part of this plan that people become responsible. Many of the problems that we are dealing with in Washington today have been made all the much harder because of years of irresponsibility at the federal level. It is time for us to go beyond partisan politics, to go beyond ideology and to say responsibility is not a Republican or a Democratic or a liberal or a conservative concept. It is at the root of what it means to be an American and we’re going to start insisting upon it being placed once again on this country’s agenda.

Thirdly, we are proposing a wholesale reduction in the frustrating and wasteful paperwork that eats up the health care system. When you look as Ira (Magaziner) and I have at the volumes of regulations that have been put into effect over the years, the stacks and stacks of forms, you ask yourself where did all this bureaucracy come from? The short answer is that it came from everywhere. It comes from private insurers. It comes from the government. Forms were created to make sure forms were filled out properly. It makes it impossible often for the most vulnerable people to get the care that they need. It also has undercut the delivery of care because as the number of health insurance companies grew — today there are more than 1,500 — so did the number of forms. The result is that instead of a system in which patient care and doctor decision-making and nurse caring drive the system, paperwork does.

Most nurses now spend nearly half of their time filling out forms. Most physicians now spend an extraordinary percentage of their income contributing to the bookkeeping and accounting necessary to fill out forms. Patients don’t know how to read these bills. They don’t understand these forms. Those of us who’ve gone to school longer than we like to admit can’t understand these forms. And yet we are continuing to be deluged by them because that is the excuse for not getting to the heart of the problem. We now need to make it clear that what is going to count is quality outcomes, not paperwork processing. If we do that, then consumers will see a health care system made understandable and easy — one insurance form for everybody, a report card for quality that is understandable so that choices can be made, no hidden fine print. Doctors and nurses will finally be able to do what they were trained and educated to do — keeping people healthy, not filling out forms.

Again, the states are paving the way. Missouri’s initiative to provide health care to children in schools will focus on making the state a primary care-giver for many children, and eliminate a lot of the unnecessary bureaucratic maneuvering and cataloging of kids that goes on now. Let’s take a child as a whole person, figure out how to take care of that child. Don’t divide him up into little pieces that fit into the welfare bureaucracy, the health bureaucracy, the child support bureaucracy, the education bureaucracy. That’s what Missouri is trying to do. That’s what this country needs to do. If we focus on preventive care and eliminate the administrative hassles that now exist, our reform efforts will work and more children will be healthier.

Fourthly, this reform will focus on addressing long term care. This is a problem that we need to get ahead of the aging curve on as soon as we can. States have a large stake in providing and paying for this country’s growing need for long term care. Many will tell us to put off consideration of this issue and not to do anything. That’s the way we got into all of these problems — don’t take on any hard issues, don’t expend any political capital, don’t make anybody mad, and maybe the voters will just think you’re doing a good job. We’ve got to put those days behind us. If we don’t begin to address long term care now, in four or eight years we will be so much further behind, it will be an extraordinary financial and human drain for us to begin then.

We have to make a start. We need to do that by building up the infrastructure in the states so that people who wish to stay in their homes and out of institutions will have that option. People who need intermediary care, whether it is adult day care or congregate housing, will have that option. As you know, individuals and families are too often bankrupt by long term care, and it is not fair to make them make that choice between money or dignity. We need a system in which we give real choices to the elderly and the disabled.

If we have an Administration and we have states that are willing to embark on this partnership together, we will create more options for community-based care, which is not only what people tell us they want, but is less expensive and will enable us to cover more people. We will expand home and community-based care in this reform proposal so that people with severe disabilities will have access to a broad array of services, coordinated by a case manager, tailored to individual needs. By expanding this availability of care, seniors and disabled citizens who can’t manage on their own will remain in their own home, or their own community as long as possible.

Finally, we will improve the availability of health care in under-served urban and under-served rural areas. It will not do us any good to have a health care reform system that holds out the promise of health security if it does not deliver. There are many parts of our country that have traditionally not had adequate access to health care. I don’t need to tell Governor Walters (of Oklahoma) or Governor King (of New Mexico) that a health security card alone will mean little to people unless we guarantee that the services they need will be available for them in even the most remote parts of America.

The President’s plan will bolster these efforts by targeting funds for areas that are now under-served. It will strengthen the health care infrastructure in these areas by linking community-based centers to other hospitals and providers, and will offer incentives for the National Health Service Corps and other programs to encourage doctors to practice in remote parts of our country. That is one of the most cost-effective things we can do — to encourage doctors and nurses and others to pay off their loans, to be forgiven for their loans, if they will go into areas that need their help. There is hardly a program that is more worthy of consideration than that, and it will be reinvigorated after being allowed basically to die on the vine over the last 12 years. If we make sure that all of our people are covered by integrated delivery networks like Governor Dean and others are talking about, then nobody, no matter where they live, will be without access to decent care.

For 12 years, these governors and those who serve with them and before them, have taken the lead in keeping health care on the agenda. Before my husband was elected President, he worked with the National Governors’ Association to craft a bipartisan approach toward health care reform. It is that kind of attitude we need to encourage, not just at the state level, but in Washington as well. We need to end the partisanship. We need to recognize that the federal government does not have all the answers, that it needs to work with the states to solve the health care crisis. In order to do that, we need real leadership from the top. That’s what this President is willing to offer. The federal government will establish the framework and set the standards. It will be up to the states to tailor the program to meet those standards and offer the guaranteed benefits in ways that each state thinks will work best for that state. We cannot do this without that kind of partnership. We need that partnership to continue what is already started, so that we can have the benefit of your advice and counsel.

There is no way that we can wave a magic wand or even pass a piece of legislation that will overnight solve all of our health care problems. Too many changes in attitudes and behavior are going to be needed. But we do know we have to take a comprehensive approach, so that we look at all these problems at one time. The President has appreciated the advice and help of the governors. We look forward to working with the governors in the weeks and months ahead, because we believe that with a health care reform plan that truly provides security for every American, we will be on the way for making it possible for this country to regain its economic leadership and its competitive position. Health care reform is part of the economic plan the President has for America. One cannot proceed without the other. Both together will not only secure security for each of us, but will insure security and leadership for this country that we all love.

Thank you very much.

Published by

Frank Marafiote

Frank started the Hillary Clinton Quarterly in 1992 and has been "keeping up with Hillary" for more than 25 years. Recently retired, he worked in advertising and communications and also taught marketing courses several times a year for a local university.

11 thoughts on “Hillary’s first speech about health care reform.”

  1. Pingback: Homepage
    1. This was a speech to the Democratic Governors Association. As such, there was no Q&A at the end. In terms of documentation, HCQ has a tape recording of the speech and most likely the local press covered the event.

  2. The response to this proposal was as negative as what we have heard voiced and written about the Affordable Health Care Act. Why are so many against providing access to health care?

  3. In an argument with an acquaintance about a supposed quote of Sec. Clinton about nurses being overpaid and underworked. I want to refute this but can find no reference online to this quote. Do you have any idea where this came from?

  4. One thing I will add to the $20 aspirin charge is it is NOT just to pay for the people who can not pay. It is creative bookkeeping. I ask you if you have EVER seen a charge for nursing care on your hospital Bill?. No because they lump our services in with room and board and then tell us nurses that we ” don’t generate revenue”! You are actually paying for the nurse who assessed that you needed something for pain, called the MD for the order, wrote and sent the order to pharmacy after checking your allergies, obtained the med, brought it to you, maybe even assisted you to take the med, charted, assessed if it helped or if you had any untoward reaction, called the MD as needed for a new order, charted and gave report to the next nurse and all this for minimally 4 but more likely 8-10 patients. So really that $20 aspirin is a bargain for the patient. NOT SO MUCH FOR THE NURSE!

  5. I remember 1993. I remember the comments on what many called ‘hate radio’. Comments about Hillary that were absolutely unconscionable. I remember how the pharmaceutical company made negative ads. I remember how the Republican Party supported this negativity.
    Hillary Clinton was attempting to develop a health care program that would ensure medical care for everyone.
    Because of President Obama, we now have The Affordable Health Care Act. One more time the Republican Party is attempting to hit the ‘delete’ key and eliminate access to health care that many could not otherwise afford.
    Why? Members of Congress have the best possible health care, health care that is not accessible to the majority of citizens of the United States of America. Yet, this party has worked hard to deny health care for those who need it most.
    Oh yes, and I agree with the comment about how Registered Nurses were compensated in 1993. We (I am a retired Registered Nurse) would never get rich on the salary.
    I hope our younger members of the Democratic Party and citizens of the United States have access to this article to enlighten them to all of the good work that Secretary Clinton has attempted to do for our country.

    1. I am also a nurse, but my focus was geriatrics back then and now it is disabled children. I remember 1993, because my Health Administration major allowed me to do an intense paper on her health care plan and how it managed chronic illness. It failed the litmus test then and given what I see now, Obamacare fails it also. The only people Obamacare actually benefits are those that do not need to use it. High deductibles are prohibitive in most cases. This is not a party issue, and never has been with the majority of Americans. It was passed as a penalty tax, forced on us. Yes, the process was askew indeed prior to Obamacare. That doesn’t mean there is not a better way, but this isn’t that better way. I see everyday that people are actually forced to choose between care they can almost afford and Medicaid to cover what they really need. It has not gotten better, it has just changed. My families tell me this everyday. Those that need it most…? ….. can’t use it because they can’t afford the premiums or deductibles. Ask my parents and my clients…..about medications and waiting to see a doctor that actually accepts what insurance families have…this needs revamped, to say the least.

      1. I found your post while searching a primary source for HRC’s remark about nurses. Still haven’t found it, so it was either a smear against her or has been buried. (I don’t use Google for searches). I completely agree with your assessment and am living the “before and after” Obamacare experience on both sides of the bedrails. My most recent exposure involved a 90 year-old with Medicare and BX “not covered” for hospitalization, rehab, transport but showered with walking boots for a fractured foot. Only aggressive advocacy and skilled gamesmanship achieved the diagnoses and treatment (non-weight-bearing etc), but she still had to bounce up the stairs on her behind after a funky car ride to family’s home for care. Ah, the good old days!

  6. You mean the Obamacare that is going up 30% this year, that state after state is seeing fail, and that now is costing more than if no law had been put in place.

    You’re a special little flower, aren’t you?

Leave a Reply to Susan Meintel Cancel reply